DIRECTIONS OF REGULATORY COORDINATION OF RESPONSIBLE (ESG) INVESTMENT IN THE WORLD: FRAGMENTATION OR UNIFICATION?
Section "Economics": Economic and Legal Problems of Sustainable Development
Abstract
To date, processes of regulatory coordination of responsible or ESG (Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance) investing are characterized by a combination of fragmentation and unification efforts. On the one hand, there is a noticeable degree of fragmentation of the regulatory landscape for responsible investing. At the level of different regions and countries, their own regulatory frameworks, standards and guidelines for disclosure of ESG information and sustainability reporting are being actively developed and improved. In particular, the European Union (EU), Great Britain, the USA and Canada, some countries of the Asia-Pacific region (Australia, China, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Singapore, etc.) have made special progress. For example, the EU has taken a significant step with the introduction of the so-called triad of regulatory instruments: the Sustainability Taxonomy, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), aimed at standardizing ESG reporting and classifying investments in sustainable development in member countries. This fragmentation creates difficulties for investors and companies operating in different jurisdictions as they must navigate and comply with different requirements. On the other hand, efforts to unify and harmonize ESG disclosure and regulatory rules are increasing. Recognizing the global nature of ESG challenges, international organizations are working to establish common principles and standards. Initiatives such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) have gained prominence worldwide, promoting transparency and consistency ESG reporting. While the trend toward unification is promising, achieving full regulatory coordination of responsible investing remains challenging. Different political priorities, cultural and economic differences between countries prevent the creation of a universally recognized regulatory framework. However, the growing recognition of the importance of ESG and the collective efforts of stakeholders around the world indicate a gradual convergence towards more coherent ESG regulations.
Keywords
responsible investment, ESG, sustainable development, regulatory regulation, coordination of actions, reporting on sustainable development, fragmentation, unification
Downloads
References
2. Regulation database. UNPRI. URL https://www.unpri.org/policy/regulation-database
3. 2022 ESG Trends to Watch. MSCI. 2022. URL: https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/9d2eeece-c2db-3d86-873f-faaac8cd62ef
4. European Green Deal. European Commission. URL: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
5. Matos P. ESG and Responsible Institutional Investing Around the World: A Critical Review. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668998
6. Daugaard D., Ding A. Global Drivers for ESG Performance: The Body of Knowledge. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042322
7. Singhania M., Saini N. Quantification of ESG Regulations: A Cross-Country Benchmarking Analysis. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. 2021. P. 097226292110541. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629211054173
8. van Oostrum C. Sustainability Through Transparency and Definitions: A Few Thoughts on Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 and Regulation (EU) 2020/852. European Company Law. 2021. Vol. 18. Iss. 1. P. 15-21. https://doi.org/10.54648/eucl2021003
9. Ahlström H., Monciardini D. The Regulatory Dynamics of Sustainable Finance: Paradoxical Success and Limitations of EU Reforms. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04763-x
10. Alessi L., Alemanni B. & Frati G. Financial Regulation for Sustainable Finance in the European Landscape. Information as a Driver of Sustainable Finance. Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93768-3
11. Makarenko I., Makarenko S. Multi-level benchmark system for sustainability reporting: EU experience for Ukraine. Accounting and Financial Control. 2023. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 41-48. https://doi.org/10.21511/afc.04(1).2023.04
12. Hoepner A.G.F., Schneider F.I. EU Green Taxonomy Data — A First Vendor Survey. The Economists’ Voice. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2022-0022
13. Rauter T. The Effect of Mandatory Extraction Payment Disclosures on Corporate Payment and Investment Policies Abroad. Journal of Accounting Research. 2020. Vol. 58. No. 5. P. 1075-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12332
14. Darendeli A., Fiechter P., Hitz J.-M. & Lehmann N. The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information in supply-chain contracting: Evidence from the expansion of CSR rating coverage. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2022. P. 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101525
15. de Silva Lokuwaduge C. S., de Silva K.M. ESG Risk Disclosure and the Risk of Green Washing. Australasian Business, Accounting and Finance Journal. 2022. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 146-159. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v16i1.10
16. Stolowy H., Paugam L. Sustainability Reporting: Is Convergence Possible? Accounting in Europe. 2023. P. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2023.2189016
17. Schacherer S. Fixing a Broken System? Sustainable Finance Taxonomies and Global Regulatory Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4491106
18. Afolabi H., Ram R., Rimmel G. Harmonization of Sustainability Reporting Regulation: Analysis of a Contested Arena. Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 9. P. 5517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095517
19. Leins S. ‘Responsible investment’: ESG and the post-crisis ethical order. Economy and Society. 2020. Vol. 49. No. 1. P. 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1702414
20. Mynhardt H., Makarenko I., Plastun A. Standardization of sustainability reporting: rationale for better investment decision-making. Public and Municipal Finance. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 7-15. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.06(2).2017.01
21. Redondo Alamillos R., de Mariz F. How Can European Regulation on ESG Impact Business Globally? Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 7. P. 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15070291
22. ECB sets deadlines for banks to deal with climate risks. European Central Bank. URL: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2022/html/ssm.pr221102~2f7070c567.en.html
23. ESMA launches a consultation on guidelines for the use of ESG or sustainability-related terms in funds’ names. European Securities and Markets Authority. URL: https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/esmalaunches-consultation-guidelines-use-esg-or-sustainability-related-terms
24. New rules on climate-related disclosures to help investors, clients and consumers. FCA. URL: https://www.fca.org.uk/news/news-stories/new-rules-climate-related-disclosures-help-investors-clients-consumers
25. ESG and Climate Trends to Watch for 2023. MSCI. 2023. URL: https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/35124068/ESG+and+Climate+Trends+to+Watch+for+2023.pdf
26. SEC Adopts Rules to Enhance Climate and ESG Disclosures for Investors. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. URL: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-46
27. Canada ESG Reporting: The Comprehensive Guide. Brightest. URL: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-andpolicy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
28. Introduction of Sustainability Preferences: EU MiFID II & IDD. NordESG. URL: https://nordesg.de/en/introduction-of-sustainability-preferences-under-eu-mifid-ii-idd/
29. Convergence of global sustainability reporting standards. Ethical Boardroom. URL: https://ethicalboardroom.com/convergence-of-global-sustainability-reporting-standards/
30. Bose S. Evolution of ESG Reporting Frameworks. Values at Work. 2020. P. 13—33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_2
31. Database. Statista. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1266650/share-reporting-frameworks-mentioned-stockexchange-esg-guidance-worldwide/
32. Abhayawansa S. Swimming against the tide: back to single materiality for sustainability reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-07-2022-0378
33. Jørgensen S., Mjøs A., Pedersen L. J. T. Sustainability reporting and approaches to materiality: tensions and potential resolutions. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2021. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 341-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-01-2021-0009
34. de Arriba-Sellier N. The International Regulation and Coordination of Sustainable Finance. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. The Hague, 2023. P. 191-222. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-587-4_8
Abstract views: 233 PDF Downloads: 268
