IMPROVING THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND LEGAL MECHANISM OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN UKRAINE
Ecological Law, Nature Resources Law, Financial Law
Abstract
It is shown that the current system of environmental management in Ukraine is inefficient because if its centralized nature. The improvement of environmental quality has been largely achieved in the European Union and some unitary states due to decentralization of environmental management. The arguments are advanced that it is necessary to build the environmental management system in Ukraine that would be based on the principle of environmental federalism.
Keywords
environmental protection, region, decentralization, unitarism, environmental federalism
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Барбашова Н.В. Об экологической безопасности региона в контексте реализации идеи бюджетного федерализма // Экономика и право. — 2010. — № 1 (26). — С. 30–35.
2. Программа научно-технического развития Донецкой области на период до 2020 года. — Донецк, 2000.
3. Національна доповідь про стан навколишнього природного середовища в Україні у 2007 році.— К., 2008. — Режим доступу : http://rada.gov.ua
4. Keating M. The Invention of Regions. Political Restructuring and Territorial Government in Western Europe. Unpublished paper for European Consortium for Political Research / M. Keating. — Oslo, 1996.
5. Барбашова Н.В. Проблеми деволюції в екологічному праві України : монографія / Н.В. Барбашова. — Донецьк : Апекс, 2007. — 268 с.
6. Percival Robert V. Environmental Federalism : Historical Roots and Contemporary Models / Robert V. Percival // Maryland Law Review.— 1995. — Vol. 54.— № 4.— P. 1141–1182.
7. Adler Jonathan H. A New Environmental Federalism : Environmental Policymakers are Increasingly Turning to the States for Solutions to Today’s Environmental Problems / Jonathan H. Adler // Forum for Applied Research & Public Policy.— 1998. — Vol. 13.
8. Wallace Oates E. A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism / Oates E. Wallace // Resources for the Future. — 2001. — November.— P. 1–54.
9. Adler Jonathan H. Jurisdictional Mismatch in Environmental Federalism / Jonathan H. Adler // N. Y. U. Environmental Law Journal. — 2005.— Vol. 14. — P. 130–178.
10. Engel Kirsten H. Harnessing the Benefits of Dynamic Federalism in Environmental Law / Kirsten H. Engel // Emory Law Journal. — 2006. — Vol. 56. — P. 159–188.
11. Stewart Richard B. Controlling Environmental Risks Through Economic Incentives / Richard B. Stewart // Columbia Journal of Environmental Law. — 1988. — Vol. 13. — P. 154.
12. U. S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Intergovernmental Decisionmaking for Environmental for Environmental Protection and Public Works. — 1992. — P. 1.
13. Vogel D. Post Environmental Federalism in the European Union and the United States / D. Vogel, M. Toffel, Diahanna // Globalization and National Environmental Policy : international conference, Veldhover, September, 2003. — Veldhover, 2003. — P. 1–23.
14. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION : Brussels, 15 April 2008. — 6655/08. — http://www.europa.eu.int/
15. Малышева Н.Р. Гармонизация экологического законодательства в Европе / Н.Р. Малышева. — К. : Фірма «КІТ», 1996. — 233 с.
2. Программа научно-технического развития Донецкой области на период до 2020 года. — Донецк, 2000.
3. Національна доповідь про стан навколишнього природного середовища в Україні у 2007 році.— К., 2008. — Режим доступу : http://rada.gov.ua
4. Keating M. The Invention of Regions. Political Restructuring and Territorial Government in Western Europe. Unpublished paper for European Consortium for Political Research / M. Keating. — Oslo, 1996.
5. Барбашова Н.В. Проблеми деволюції в екологічному праві України : монографія / Н.В. Барбашова. — Донецьк : Апекс, 2007. — 268 с.
6. Percival Robert V. Environmental Federalism : Historical Roots and Contemporary Models / Robert V. Percival // Maryland Law Review.— 1995. — Vol. 54.— № 4.— P. 1141–1182.
7. Adler Jonathan H. A New Environmental Federalism : Environmental Policymakers are Increasingly Turning to the States for Solutions to Today’s Environmental Problems / Jonathan H. Adler // Forum for Applied Research & Public Policy.— 1998. — Vol. 13.
8. Wallace Oates E. A Reconsideration of Environmental Federalism / Oates E. Wallace // Resources for the Future. — 2001. — November.— P. 1–54.
9. Adler Jonathan H. Jurisdictional Mismatch in Environmental Federalism / Jonathan H. Adler // N. Y. U. Environmental Law Journal. — 2005.— Vol. 14. — P. 130–178.
10. Engel Kirsten H. Harnessing the Benefits of Dynamic Federalism in Environmental Law / Kirsten H. Engel // Emory Law Journal. — 2006. — Vol. 56. — P. 159–188.
11. Stewart Richard B. Controlling Environmental Risks Through Economic Incentives / Richard B. Stewart // Columbia Journal of Environmental Law. — 1988. — Vol. 13. — P. 154.
12. U. S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Intergovernmental Decisionmaking for Environmental for Environmental Protection and Public Works. — 1992. — P. 1.
13. Vogel D. Post Environmental Federalism in the European Union and the United States / D. Vogel, M. Toffel, Diahanna // Globalization and National Environmental Policy : international conference, Veldhover, September, 2003. — Veldhover, 2003. — P. 1–23.
14. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION : Brussels, 15 April 2008. — 6655/08. — http://www.europa.eu.int/
15. Малышева Н.Р. Гармонизация экологического законодательства в Европе / Н.Р. Малышева. — К. : Фірма «КІТ», 1996. — 233 с.
Abstract views: 98 PDF Downloads: 105
Published
2010-10-25
Section
articles
