Problems of modernization of economic legislation


Overcoming a large number of conspiracies in the field of public procurement and ensuring compliance with the principles of fair competition in the implementation of procurement is one of the tasks of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine, as the public procurement appeal body. With the adoption of the Law of Ukraine "On public procurement" in 2016, an electronic form of bidding was introduced, but unfortunately this did not contribute to the reduction of speculations and offenses in the field of public procurement. Public procurement of goods, works and services is a legal tool that gives the state the right to choose on the basis of compliance with the competitive conditions of business entities that will carry out the state order on the most favorable market conditions. This can be carried out only on the basis of an impartial bidding process for conducting a procurement and selecting a winner based on honest competitive methods. The final result of public procurement is the effective designation of a supplier who fully meets the qualification criteria of the competition and has established the lowest price for its products, works or services. In modern economic conditions, public procurement is an important mechanism for the implementation of state economic policy. With Ukraine’s accession to the WTO, compliance with the provisions of the Public Procurement Agreement is imperative. After the introduction of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU in 2016, the norms of national legislation on public procurement should be harmonized with the corresponding EU legislation on public procurement. Attention should be paid to the improvement of the public procurement appeal mechanism. The process of bringing to justice violators in the field of public procurement needs to be clarified and settled at the legislative level.


  1. Olefir A. Uhoda pro derzhavni zakupivli SOT: pravovi naslidky dlia Ukrainy. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. 2017. No. 3. P. 79-84 [in Ukrainian].

  2. Dovbenko A.M. Administratyvno-pravovi zasady rozghliadu Antymonopollnym komitetom skarh pro porushennia zakonodavsva u sferi publichnykh zakupivel: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.07. Kyiv, 2017. 256 p. [in Ukrainian].

  3. Melnykov O.S. Osoblyvosti publichnykh zakupivel yak obiekta derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia ekonomiky. Derzhavne rehuliuvannia protsesiv ekonomichnoho i sotsialnoho rozvytku. 2016. No. 1 (52). P. 1-7 [in Ukrainian].

  4. Tkachenko N.B., Umantsiv Yu.M. Makroekonomichni aspekty derzhavnykh zakupivel. Finansy Ukrainy. 2009. No. 8. P. 82-88 [in Ukrainian].

  5. Ovramets Yu.M. Poniattia ta sutnist «publichnykh zakupivel» v administratyvnomu pravi Ukrainy. Visnyk Vyshchoho administratyvnoho sudu Ukrainy. 2017. No. 1/2. P. 41-49 [in Ukrainian].

  6. Guidelines on method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation No. 1/2003. (text with EEA relevans), June 2006. URL:

  7. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council "On public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC" of 26 February 2014. URL: .2014.094.01.0065.01.ENG


anticompetitive concerted actions, economic competition, bidding, tenders, unfair competition, public procurement, customer, bidder


Download data is not yet available.


1. Олефір А. Угода про державні закупівлі СОТ: правові наслідки для України. Підприємництво, господарство і право. 2017. № 3. С. 79—84.

2. Довбенко А.М. Адміністративно-правові засади розгляду Антимонопольним комітетом скарг про порушення законодавства у сфері публічних закупівель: дис. … канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.07. Київ, 2017. 256 с.

3. Мельников О.С. Особливості публічних закупівель як об’єкта державного регулювання економіки. Державне регулювання процесів економічного і соціального розвитку. 2016. № 1 (52). С. 1—7.

4. Ткаченко Н.Б., Уманців Ю.М. Макроекономічні аспекти державних закупівель. Фінанси України. 2009. № 8. С. 82—88.

5. Оврамець Ю.М. Поняття та сутність «публічних закупівель» в адміністративному праві України. Вісник Вищого адміністративного суду України. 2017. № 1/2. С. 41—49.

6. Guidelines on method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23 (2) (a) of Regulation № 1/2003. (text with EEA relevans), June 2006. URL: (дата звернення: 23.10.2018).

7. Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council «On public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC» of 26 February 2014. URL: (дата звернення: 23.10.2018).

Abstract views: 227
PDF Downloads: 150