DISCOURSE FRAME FOR MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DOMINANT STRATEGY FOR INTERREGIONAL ECONOMIC COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT

Economic and legal problems of regional development

Abstract

In the conditions of deep regional disproportions and asymmetries, the most important task for the mezzo-level subjects’ development is the problem solution of forming a single economic space and mitigating the existing manifestations of differentiation between regions. To solve these problems, it is advisable to make decisions to activate and develop in terregional economic cooperation of those regions that are partners. Therefore, the task is to form a strategy for the development of interregional economic cooperation, which will become the dominant (basic) on the territory of the Ukrainian regional environment, the successful implementation of which through the monitoring process will help elimination or mitigation of regional development asymmetries. The purpose of this article is to reveal the essence of monitoring as one of the main stages of the dominant strategy implementation for the development of interregional economic cooperation. Attention focused on fact that all stages of the dominant strategy formation for the development of interregional economic cooperation have great importance, but it is from the results of a competent monitoring that the provisions of the strategy could be considered by effective or ineffective. Some provisions of the "Method for developing, monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of the implementation of regional development strategies and action plans for their implementation" (Order of the Ministry of Regional Development, Construction and Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine dated March 31, 2016, No. 79) are sup plemented and adapted for the development of interregional economic cooperation. The main stages of monitoring the dominant strategy implementation for the development of interregional economic cooperation and their features are identified: preparation for monitoring; collection of necessary information; information-processing, analysis of its results and making relevant decisions. Also the monitoring features of the dominant strategy for the development of interregional economic interaction are disclosed: necessity for information support; promotion of strategy positions in various target groups of stakeholders; recommendations for creating a special monitoring group, which will include representatives of various stakeholder groups, necessity for harmonize the provisions of socio-economic relevant programs not only inter-regional, but also regional and local level strategic documents, and the dominant strategy. Based on the proposed recommendations, a fragment of documenting the monitoring of the dominant strategy implementation for the development of interregional economic cooperation has been developed.

REFERENCES

1. Bielienkyi P., Mikula N. Formuvannia ta rozvytok systemy mizhrehionalnoho ta transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva v Ukraini. Rehionalna ekonomika. 2011. No. 3. P. 61-73 [in Ukrainian].


2. Mezhevych N., Radvilavichius Sh. Rol mizhrehionalnoho spivrobitnytstva v dvostoronnikh i rehionalnykh prohramakh ekonomichnoho rozvytku. URL: http://www.norden.org [in Ukrainian].


3. Storonianska I. Mizhrehionalni intehratsiini protsesy v Ukraini: tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Lviv, 2009. 392 p. [in Ukrainian].


4. Prokopenko L.L., Rudik O.M., Shumliaieva I.D. Rozvytok rehionalnoho spivrobitnytstva Ukrainy v konteksti yevropeiskoi intehratsii. Donetsk, 2011. 132 p. [in Ukrainian].


5. Studennikov I. Fenomen yevrorehioniv v konteksti metodolohii istoryko-rehionalnykh doslidzhen. Istoriia Ukrainy. Malovidomi imena, podii, fakty. 2008. 224 p. [in Ukrainian].


6. Tereshchenko T.V. Naukovo-metodychni osnovy zabezpechennia rozvytku transkordonnoho spivrobitnytstva: avtoref. dys. … kand. ekon. nauk. Kyiv, 2005. 20 p. [in Ukrainian].


7. Babinova O. Mizhrehionalne spivrobitnytstvo: zmist, formy, rol ta problemy realizatsii v Ukraini. Derzhavne upravlinnia ta mistseve samovriaduvannia. 2011. Iss. 4 (11). P. 45-49 [in Ukrainian].


8. Balian A.V. Mizhrehionalne transkordonne spivrobitnytstvo Ukrainy za umov rozshyrennia Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu (na prykladi prykordonnykh rehioniv Ukrainy ta Uhorshchyny). Uzhhorod: Lira, 2005. 320 p. [in Ukrainian].


9. Bila S.O., Babets I.H., Valiushko I.V., Zhalilo Ya.A. Mizhrehionalne spivrobitnytstvo u systemi novoi rehionalnoi polityky Ukrainy. Kyiv, 2011. 32 p. [in Ukrainian].


10. Vorotniuk M.O., Zakharchenko A.M., Makukh V.V., Fylypenko A.O. Shchodo vykorystannia potentsialu mizhrehionalnoho spivrobitnytstva u kompleksnomu rozvytku prymorskykh rehioniv Ukrainy. Odesa, 2014. URL: http://www.niss.gov.ua/articles/968 [in Ukrainian].


11. Metodyka rozroblennia, provedennia monitorynhu ta otsinky rezultatyvnosti realizatsii rehionalnykh stratehii rozvytku ta planiv zakhodiv z yikh realizatsii: Nakaz Ministerstva rehionalnoho rozvytku, budivnytstva ta zhytlovokomunalnoho hospodarstva Ukrainy vid 31.03.2016 No. 79. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0632-16#n165 [in Ukrainian].


12. Rohozian Yu.S., Hrechana S.I. Ohliad suchasnoi systemy pokaznykiv otsinky efektyvnosti mizhrehionalnoho spivrobitnytstva v konteksti innovatsiinoho rozvytku krainy. Podilskyi naukovyi visnyk. Nauky: ekonomika, pedahohika. 2017. No. 1. P. 69-71 [in Ukrainian].


13. Boychenko E.B., Hrechana S.I. Monitoring as a tool for modernization infrastructure interregional cooperation. European Reforms Bulletin. 2016. No. 2. P. 6-11.


14. Zablodska I.V., Drobotenko S.P. ta in. Monitorynh realizatsii stratehii ekonomichnoho ta sotsialnoho rozvytku rehionu. Luhansk: Noulidzh, 2012. 157 p. [in Ukrainian].