ON USE OF THE RESULTS OF LEGAL RESEARCH IN ECONOMY

Series "Law": Theory and history of Economic Law and Procedure

Abstract

The article considers the state of use of the results of legal research in the field of economics on the basis of the analysis of abstracts on the specialty “law” and found that the overwhelming majority of such results are aimed at updating legislation. The normative-legal acts concerning preparation of doctors of philosophy and doctors of sciences concerning such signs of scientific results as practical value and the possibility of their use in normative activity and the corresponding problems have been analyzed. Attention is drawn to scientific literature on the impact of the results of legal research on norm-setting activities and emphasizes the lack of correlation between them. Are proposed ways to increase the practical value of the results of legal research in the field of economics and the use of such results in normative activities. Among such areas is the coordination of such research by developing and adopting a state target interbranch program of legal research in the field of economics, clarifying the legal principles for adopting such a program, clarifying its objectives, terms of action. The following direction is justified by the establishment of requirements for conducting such research and their results on the basis of the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Principles of State Regulatory Policy in the Field of Economic Activity", in particular on the mandatory stages of elaboration of the existing normative and legal acts and the justification for their updating or adoption of new normative legal act. One more direction to increase the level of use of the results of legal research is proposed to consider the establishment of a requirement for the use of the "batch" principle in the preparation of proposals for the improvement of legislation, the essence of such a principle is disclosed and attention is drawn to the expediency of using the experience of the Republic of Belarus on this issue. It is proposed to recognize the practical value and use of scientific results as one of the main features of both the dissertation itself and the process of its protection, for which to develop and make appropriate changes to the normative legal acts regulating the process of certification of applicants of higher qualification.

REFERENCES

1. Pro zasady derzhavnoi rehuliatornoi polityky u sferi hospodarskoi diialnosti: Zakon Ukrainy vid 11.09.2003 No. 1160-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2004. No. 9. Art. 79 [in Ukrainian].
2. Znamenskij G.L. Sovershenstvovanie hozjajstvennogo zakonodatel’stva: cel’ i sredstva. Kiev: Nauk. dumka, 1980. 183 p. [in Russian].
3. Zeldina O., Hryshko V. Poniattia i napriamy modernizatsii hospodarskoho zakonodavstva. Yurydychna Ukraina. 2015. No. 78. P. 58-61 [in Ukrainian].
4. Podtserkovnyi O.P., Belianevych O.A. Kodyfikatsiia ekonomichnoho zakonodavstva — vdoskonalennia na osnovi zakordonnoho dosvidu i analizu vitchyznianoho zakonodavstva. Holos Ukrainy. 13.04.2016. URL: http://www.golos.com.ua/article/267038 [in Ukrainian].
5. Mamutov V.K. Posylyty vplyv akademichnoi nauky na formuvannia ekonomichnoho zakonodavstva. Visnyk NAN Ukrainy. 2012. No. 7. P. 26-30 [in Ukrainian].
6. Bobkova A.H. Shchodo pidhotovky fakhivtsiv osvitnonaukovoho i naukovoho rivniv vyshchoi yurydychnoi osvity. Pravnychyi chasopys Donetskoho universytetu. 2015. No. 1/2 (32). P. 121-124 [in Ukrainian].
7. Bobkova A.H. Shchodo koordynatsii hospodarskopravovykh doslidzhen ta vprovadzhennia yikh rezultativ. Aktualni problemy hospodarskoho prava i hospodarskoho protsesu: Materialy kruhloho stolu (Kyiv, 9 lystopada 2018 r.). Kyiv, Lira. 2018. 260 p. [in Ukrainian].
8. Bobkova A.H. Praktychna tsinnist rezultativ hospodarskopravovykh
doslidzhen. Pershi naukovi chytannia pamiati akademika V.K. Mamutova: Materialy kruhloho stolu (Kyiv, 8 liutoho 2019 r.). 2019. 264 p. [in Ukrainian].
9. Perelik tem dysertatsiinykh doslidzhen z problem derzhavy i prava (zatverdzhenykh u 2018 r.). Kharkov: Pravo, 2019. 290 p. [in Ukrainian].
10. Metodicheskie rekomendacii po primeneniju "paketnogo" principa podgotovki i prinjatija (izdanija) proektov normativnyh pravovyh aktov: Prikaz direktora Nacional’nogo centra zakonoproektnoj dejatel’nosti pri Prezidente Respubliki Belarus’ ot 10.08.2006 No. 33. URL: http://center.gov.by/normotvorcheskayadeyatelnost/podgotovkaproektovnormativnyhpra/metodicheskoerukovodstvopodgotovko [in Russian].
11. Koncepcija modernizacii hozjajstvennogo zakonodatel’stva na baze Hozjajstvennogo kodeksa Ukrainy (proekt). Economics and Law. 2006. No. 2. P. 5-16 [in Russian].