WAYS TO PROTECT INFRINGED RIGHTS TO TECHNOLOGY: CIVIL AND ECONOMIC LAW ASPECTS
Abstract
The article examines technology as an object of legal regulation and highlights the ways of protecting violated rights to technology. The article examines technology as an object of legal regulation and identifies the ways to protect infringed rights to technology. The novelty of the work lies in the author's identification of the specifics of the ways to protect infringed rights to technology within the framework of Civil and Economic law. The author proves that the concept of “technology” is widely used in the literature, but there are significant differences of opinion among scholars regarding its essence. The research has led to the conclusion that technology can be considered as an object of Civil and Economic law relations. The author points out that technology is not an object of intellectual property rights, since an exhaustive list of intellectual property objects is provided in Article 420 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. However, the author notes that the object of technology may be objects of intellectual property rights (in particular, industrial property rights). It is determined that fixation and mediation of relations of an innovative nature by concluding a technology transfer agreement with certain conditions and requirements are necessary to ensure additional legal protection of the parties to a technology transfer agreement. The article emphasizes that the process of technology transfer and its transferred components are necessarily formalized through the conclusion of a technology transfer agreement. The author notes that since the essential terms of a technology transfer agreement include the parties' liability for breach of the agreement and the procedure for resolving disputes regarding the fulfillment of the agreement, in case of breach of the agreement, general remedies may be applied to protect the parties to contractual relations in the field of technology transfer. Moreover, within the framework of civil law relations, the most popular will be compensation for damages due to non-performance or improper performance of a technology transfer agreement. The author emphasizes that technology is an object of legal regulation, its individual components have the legal status of other objects of Civil law regulation, and therefore, in case of infringement of intellectual property rights to technology, both general and special remedies for protection of rights to technology are applicable.
Keywords
technology, protection of intellectual property rights, object of legal regulation, methods of protection of rights, contract, Civil law, Economic law
Downloads
References
2. Holieva N.K. Udoskonalennia zakonodavstva Ukrainy pro innovatsiinu diialnist: napriamy, zasoby ta systematyzatsiia: dys. … d-ra filosofii: 081 “Pravo”. Natsionalnyi yurydychnyi un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho. Kharkiv. 241 p. [in Ukrainian].
3. Corrigendum to Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights. OJ L 157. 30.4.2004). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32004L0048R%2801%29
4. Intelektualna vlasnist ta patentoznavstvo: pidruchnyk. Za red. prof. P.M. Tsybulova ta dots. A.S. Romashko. Kyiv: KPI im. Ihoria Sikorskoho. Vyd-vo “Politekhnika”, 2021. 374 p. [in Ukrainian].
5. Gutterman A., Erlich J. Technology development and transfer. Quorum Books, Westport, Conn, 1997. 215 p.
6. Adamiuk D.I. Poniattia tekhnolohii: vstanovlennia zmistu ta spivvidnoshennia z inshymy sumizhnymy poniattiamy. Pravo ta innovatsiine suspilstvo. 2015. No. 1. P. 34-41 [in Ukrainian].
7. Omelchenko A.V. Pravove rehuliuvannia diialnosti u sferi transferu tekhnolohii v Ukraini. Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys. 2021. No. 3. Ch. 1. P. 82-86. https://doi.org/10.32850/sulj.2021.3.1.14 [in Ukrainian].
8. Paduchak B.M. Tekhnolohiia yak obiekt tsyvilno-pravovykh vidnosyn. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti. 2009. No. 5 (49). P. 54-59 [in Ukrainian].
9. Paduchak B.M. Transfer tekhnolohii: tsyvilno-pravovyi aspekt. Kyiv: NDI IV NAPrNU, 2012. 217 p. [in Ukrainian].
10. Zhornokui Yu.M., Podrez-Riapolova I.V. Obiekt pravovidnosyn u sferi venchurnoho investuvannia innovatsiinoi diialnosti. Pravo ta innovatsii. 2022. No. 1 (37). P. 31-37. https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2022-1(37)-4 [in Ukrainian].
11. Davydiuk O.M. Tekhnolohiia yak obiekt hospodarsko-pravovoho rehuliuvannia: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. Kharkiv, 2009. 222 p. [in Ukrainian].
12. Shtefan A. Tsyvilno-pravovi sposoby zakhystu avtorskoho prava i sumizhnykh prav. Teoriia i praktyka intelektualnoi vlasnosti. 2009. No. 2. P. 41-51 [in Ukrainian].
13. Kot O.O. Spetsialni sposoby zakhystu subiektyvnykh tsyvilnykh prav. Pravo Ukrainy. 2017. No. 1. P. 91-100 [in Ukrainian].
14. Stasiv A.P. Tsyvilnyi dohovir — pravovyi rehuliator vidnosyn shchodo stvorennia ta realizatsii innovatsii. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriia Pravo. 2022. Iss. 72. Ch. 2. P. 296-301 [in Ukrainian].
15. Kholiavka S.V. Tsyvilno-pravovi dohovory u sferi innovatsiinoi diialnosti: dys. … d-ra filosofii: 081 “Pravo”. Lvivsky¢ natsionalny¢ un-t im. Ivana Franka. Lviv, 2023. 185 p. [in Ukrainian].
16. Simson O.E. Tekhnolohiia yak obiekt prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Aktualni problemy nauky i praktyky tsyvilnoho, zhytlovoho ta simeinoho prava: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 91-richchiu z dnia narodzh. V.P. Maslova (m. Kharkiv, 15 liut. 2013 r.) Kharkiv: Pravo, 2013. P. 188-192 [in Ukrainian].
17. Suslikov L.M., Studeniak I.P. Stvorennia obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti: Navchalnyi posibnyk. Uzhhorod: Vydavnytstvo UzhNU “Hoverla”, 2020. 407 p. [in Ukrainian].
18. Aktualni pytannia hospodarsko-pravovoho zabezpechennia innovatsiinoi polityky derzhavy. Za zah. nauk. red. Zadykhaila D.V. Kharkiv: Vydavets SPD FO Vapniarchuk N.M., 2006. 256 p. [in Ukrainian].
19. Davydiuk O.M. Tekhnolohiia yak obiekt hospodarsko-pravovoho rehuliuvannia. Kharkiv: FINN, 2010. 176 p. [in Ukrainian].
20. Paduchak B.M. Transfer tekhnolohii: tsyvilno-pravovyi aspekt. Kyiv: NDI IV NAPrNU, 2012. 217 p. [in Ukrainian].
21. Zoboviazalne pravo: teoriia i praktyka: navch. posib. Za red. O.V. Dzery. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 1998. 912 p. [in Ukrainian].
22. Kot O.O. Sposoby zakhystu storin dohovoru v pryvatnomu pravi Ukrainy. Pravo Ukrainy. 2013. No. 2. P. 203-210. [in Ukrainian].
23. Yanchuk A.V. Vidshkoduvannia zbytkiv yak sposib zakhystu tsyvilnykh prav ta interesiv: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. KNUTSh. Kyiv, 2011. 220 p. [in Ukrainian].
24. Andreitseva O.B. Tsyvilno-pravovi sposoby zakhystu prav na obiekty promyslovoi vlasnosti: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. KNUTSh. Kyiv, 2009. 221 p. [in Ukrainian].
25. Kochkodan I.V. Systema zakhodiv tsyvilno-pravovoi vidpovidalnosti za porushennia prav intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional'nogo universiteta im. V.I. Vernadskogo Serija “Juridicheskie nauki”. 2013. Vol. 26 (65). No. 2-1 (Ch. 1). P. 274-281 [in Ukrainian].
26. Tkachuk A.L. Znachennia vyny u vidnosynakh vidpovidalnosti za porushennia dohovirnykh zoboviazan: dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.03. Odeska nats. yuryd. akademiia. Odesa, 2002. 236 p. [in Ukrainian].
27. Benedysiuk I.M. ta in. Posibnyk dlia suddiv z intelektualnoi vlasnosti. Kyiv: K. I. S., 2018. 424 p. [in Ukrainian].
28. Skrypnyk V.L., Biliavska Ye.R. Zahalni pytannia zakhystu prava vlasnosti ta inshykh rechovykh prav. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. 2022. No. 4. P. 176-178. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-4/39 [in Ukrainian].
29. Ohliadovyi lyst Vyshchoho hospodarskoho sudu Ukrainy vid 17.04.2006 No. 01-8I847 “Pro praktyku zastosuvannia hospodarskymy sudamy zakonodavstva pro zakhyst prav na znaky dlia tovariv ta posluh (torhovelnu marku)”. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v_847600-06#Text [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 81 PDF Downloads: 56
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
